Are software patents good or evil?
(Some say they stifle innovation while others believe they still serve the original purpose—encouraging invention for the greater good)
Status:
Open Sep 14, 2016 - 04:35 PM
8answers
Answers
Sep 14, 2016 - 04:40 PM
Good. I think particularly for startups, having patented capabilities allow you to acknowledge your innovation and effectively play defense against bigger players.
Sep 24, 2016 - 03:11 PM
Evil at this point.
Oct 04, 2016 - 01:32 PM
Largely evil. I think if you do something truly novel you deserve protection. A lot of stuff that are patents are what we call process patents which are pretty evil.
Oct 17, 2016 - 11:21 AM
Good. But I think they're overused and need to be limited, but good overall to protecting the nation.
Oct 17, 2016 - 11:21 AM
Generally evil. But I think in some circumstances they can make sense.
Nov 12, 2016 - 02:41 PM
Mostly evil. Partly good, but it's hard to find a great examples where it helps the people who are actually innovating and bringing prowess to market and a lot more examples where it's just a patent troll who really brought patents in order to extort people.
May 26, 2017 - 07:39 PM
Evil. Software is already protected by copyright; patents limit progress by forcing developers to risk a minefield of related products, and hurt consumers by preventing similar interfaces.
Aug 13, 2017 - 05:58 PM
Software patent, evil. I think most software is ingenious unless it's being used offensively, it's a pretty big problem in our industry.
Answer this question
Share Your Own Experience & Expertise
We look to ensure that every question is answered by the best people with relevant expertise and experience, the best answers include multiple perspectives. Do you have relevant expertise or experience to contribute your answer to any of these commonly asked questions?
Add New Comment